Jorge Messias, Brazil’s attorney general, could become one of the longest-serving justices in the history of the Supreme Federal Court if his nomination is approved, a projection by this newsroom shows. Born in February 1980, Messias would be eligible to remain on the court until the statutory retirement age of 75, potentially serving until early 2055 and approaching 29 years on the bench depending on the date of his swearing in.
Jorge Messias STF tenure projections
The projection assumes that Messias and the current composition of ministers remain until the compulsory retirement age. Under that scenario, Messias would rank sixth in longevity among ministers across the republican era of Brazil. Only a handful of justices have served more than 25 years; among the 161 ministers who have left the court, only five exceeded that mark.
At the top of the all time list sits Dias Toffoli, who could reach approximately 33 years on the court if he retires at the limit. Celso de Mello and Marco Aurélio are the present record holders among those who have already left, each serving a little over 31 years. Messias would follow a historic line of long-serving figures, some of whom remained during periods when the court had no compulsory retirement age.
The expansion of the retirement ceiling in 2015 from 70 to 75 years, known as the PEC da Bengala, effectively extended potential tenures by five years for ministers appointed since then. That change has contributed materially to the possibility that several current appointees could remain on the court for more than a quarter century. Of the 31 ministers named since 1985, ten were under 50 at appointment, and six of the youngest appointees belong to the current composition that could exceed 25 years of service.
Other figures considered for the vacancy left by Luís Roberto Barroso, such as Senator Rodrigo Pacheco and TCU president Bruno Dantas, are of similar age and would also be in a position to complete long tenures if appointed. With Messias added, seven of the court’s 11 ministers could reach or exceed 25 years in office.
Legal scholars note how extended tenures affect the judiciary. Heloisa Câmara, a law professor at UFPR, highlights that the possibility of long service was designed to protect judicial independence so justices can decide without political pressure. Luciano Da Ros of UFSC observes that lengthy terms can, paradoxically, lead justices to develop institutional interests distinct from those of the political actors who appointed them. As he puts it, a justice who spends decades on the bench may become more autonomous over time.
Historically, some ministers left the court before their time for political reasons. During the 20th century several were removed or forced into retirement by executive interventions. Those episodes help explain why constitutional rules on tenure and retirement carry weight far beyond administrative detail; they shape the balance between the judiciary and other branches of government.
Confirmation of Messias would therefore carry symbolic and practical implications for the court’s composition for decades. Beyond the numbers, the nomination prompts a wider discussion about appointment timing, generational change, and how the structure of judicial tenure influences the independence and direction of Brazil’s highest court.

Key Takeaways:
- Projection shows Jorge Messias could serve until 2055, giving him roughly 29 years on the court.
- If confirmed, Messias would join a small group of justices with potential tenures over 25 years, increasing to seven of 11 current ministers.
- The 2015 retirement age change from 70 to 75 added five years to potential tenures, affecting modern appointments.
- Experts say long tenures can both protect judicial independence and unexpectedly distance justices from those who appointed them.

















