Key Takeaways:
- Sreelekha has opened a small constituency office near VK Prashanth’s premises in Thiruvananthapuram, posting photos and video on Facebook.
- The new office, described as cramped and surrounded by rubbish, received 18 visitors on its first day.
- Sreelekha demanded that Prashanth vacate an office in the same corporation building, a move that sparked recent controversy.
- Sreelekha emphasised that sincere public servants can work effectively even in modest spaces, using the hashtag Sreelekha new office Thiruvananthapuram in her post.
Sreelekha opens modest office in Thiruvananthapuram amid dispute with VK Prashanth
Former IPS officer and local representative R. Sreelekha has opened a small constituency office in Shastramangal, Thiruvananthapuram, close to the office of MLA VK Prashanth. The announcement, made via Sreelekha’s Facebook page with accompanying photos and video, follows days of public disagreement between the two politicians over office space in the corporation building.
Sreelekha new office Thiruvananthapuram: what was announced
Sreelekha described the new premises as a ‘small space’ rather than a single room, acknowledging limitations but stressing that earnest public servants can operate from modest surroundings. She said the office received 18 visitors by noon on its first day and that providing assistance to them was satisfying and sufficient. The social media posts included images of the room and a video showing the area around the office, which Sreelekha said was littered with tonnes of garbage.
In her Facebook updates, Sreelekha noted the office measures roughly 70–75 square feet and highlighted the poor condition of the surrounding area. Her message framed the move as service-driven, arguing that commitment and sincerity matter more than facilities.
Background to the dispute
The new office opening comes after Sreelekha publicly urged MLA VK Prashanth to vacate his office in the Shastramangal corporation building so she could operate from a more convenient location for her ward. Sreelekha has said she found Prashanth’s presence in the building an impediment to setting up accessible constituent services. The request escalated into a public controversy, drawing attention on social media and at local political forums.
Supporters and residents have been watching the situation closely. Sreelekha’s posts emphasised direct public service over formalities, suggesting that even a small office can serve the needs of constituents if staffed by dedicated personnel. The posts have been shared widely within local networks, largely focused on the practical aspects of constituency work rather than personal attack.
What this means locally
Locally, the episode highlights tensions that can arise when multiple elected representatives and officials seek the same civic infrastructure. The dispute over office space raises questions about resource allocation within municipal buildings and the expectations constituents hold for accessibility and service delivery.
For residents of Sreelekha’s ward, the immediate outcome is the availability of a nearby point of contact, albeit in a compact and imperfect space. Sreelekha’s emphasis on helping those who came to the office on the first day suggests a pragmatic approach: prioritise immediate assistance while longer-term solutions for adequate office space are sought.
As the story develops, observers will be watching whether the parties reach a formal arrangement on office allocation within the corporation building and how local administrators respond to complaints about the state of the surrounding area. For now, Sreelekha’s open office stands as a statement that constituency work can begin even under modest conditions.

















